Efficiency Olfactometry Tests: Technical Foundations, Sampling Protocols, and Result Interpretation

Abatimiento catalítico de emisiones de óxido etileno


Why efficiency olfactometry matters


In environmental consulting, odor is not a subjective complaint: it is a measurable environmental parameter. Efficiency olfactometry tests are essential to evaluate the performance of deodorization systems (such as scrubber towers) and to demonstrate regulatory compliance, operational efficiency, and environmental responsibility.

This article explains how odor samples are taken, analyzed, and interpreted under the European reference framework, with a focus on technical rigor, traceability, and data reliability.


Regulatory and accreditation framework


Odor concentration analyses are carried out by dynamic olfactometry in accordance with:

  • UNE-EN 13725:2004
    Air quality :  Determination of odor concentration by dynamic olfactometry
  • UNE-EN ISO/IEC 17025:2017
    General requirements for the competence of testing laboratories

All analyses must be performed by a laboratory accredited by ENAC, ensuring:

  • Technical competence
  • Validated methodologies
  • Full traceability and controlled uncertainty


In the case described, analyses are conducted under ENAC accreditation nº 1046/LE2024, which is a critical guarantee of data reliability.



Odor sampling: technical requirements and best practice


Correct sampling is non-negotiable. Poor sampling invalidates even the most accurate laboratory analysis.

Sampling location

Samples are taken at the inlet of the deodorization system, i.e. before the scrubber tower, to assess treatment efficiency by comparison with outlet measurements (when applicable).

Sampling bags and materials

All samples are collected in Nalophan bags, specifically designed for olfactometric analysis:

  • Capacities: 10 L, 25 L, or 55 L
  • Material: Nalophan (polyethylene terephthalate)
    – Odorless
    – Chemically inert
  • Inlet tube: 8 mm PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene)
  • All materials classified as suitable under UNE-EN 13725:2004

These specifications are not optional:   they are required to avoid contamination, adsorption, or odor loss.


Filling, transport, and storage conditions


Bag filling

Sample bags must not be filled to 100%.

  • Recommended filling volume: 80: 90%
  • Reason: pressure changes during transport (especially air transport) can compromise sample integrity
Transport and storage

To maintain representativeness:

  • Temperature:
    • Below 25 °C
    • Above the sample dew point
  • Storage:
    • In opaque containers
    • Protected from light exposure
  • Timing:
    • Samples should ideally arrive at the laboratory on the same day
    • Maximum allowed time between sampling and analysis: 30 hours (EN 13725 requirement)

Failure to meet these conditions introduces systematic bias and may invalidate results.

Laboratory analysis by dynamic olfactometry


All odor samples are analyzed by an independent ENAC-accredited laboratory under ISO 17025, using dynamic olfactometry as defined in UNE-EN 13725:2004.

Key output

  • Odor concentration, expressed in odor units per cubic meter (ouE/m³)
Measurement uncertainty

Interpretation of results must explicitly consider:

  • The uncertainty ranges defined in EN 13725, particularly Appendix G

Ignoring uncertainty is a common (and serious) analytical error

Complementary analyses (when applicable)


Depending on project scope and regulatory requirements, the odor study may be complemented with:

Pollutant concentration analyses

  • Dräger colorimetric tubes (field measurements)
  • Laboratory-based chemical analyses
VOC concentration analyses

  • MiniRae 3000 analyzer (real-time screening)
  • Laboratory VOC analyses
TOC (Total Organic Carbon)

Laboratory determination of TOC concentration, critical for understanding odor precursors and treatment efficiency

Final report: structure and deliverables


The final technical report consolidates all validated results and includes, at minimum:

  • Odor concentration results (ouE/m³)
  • Pollutant concentration results, if applicable:
    • Dräger tube measurements
    • Laboratory analyses
  • VOC concentration results, if applicable:
    • MiniRae 3000 data
    • Laboratory analyses
  • TOC concentration results from laboratory testing


A robust report does not merely list values; it ensures:

  • Traceability
  • Compliance with standards
  • Transparent uncertainty treatment
  • Technical defensibility in regulatory or legal contexts

Bottom line




Efficiency olfactometry tests are only as good as:

  1. Sampling discipline
  2. Accredited laboratory analysis
  3. Correct interpretation of uncertainty

Cut corners in any of these steps and the data loses technical and regulatory value. When executed correctly, however, dynamic olfactometry provides objective, defensible evidence of odor impact and deodorization system performance; exactly what regulators, operators, and communities require.

Related Posts

Sistema de recuperación de MEA mediante destilación al vacío

Closing the Loop on MEA:

Soft drinks depend on food-grade CO₂ for their signature effervescence. In this facility, CO₂ is scrubbed from fermentation off-gas or other industrial sources using an aqueous MEA loop. Over time,

Read More »
laboratorio de aire y gases

Air and Gas Lab Services

Air and gas lab services are essential for organizations seeking to control emissions, improve air quality, and ensure compliance with environmental regulations.

Read More »